All comparisons

Peec AI, Otterly.ai or Digitalyser.io: is an AI visibility tracker enough?

On measurement, those tools are better than we are, and it should be said. Otterly.ai tracks four engines from $29 a month; Peec AI, claimed by more than 3,000 brands and agencies, goes up to 350 prompts tracked daily. We query three. If your need is to measure your share of voice inside assistants precisely, buy one of them — we do not claim to do better. But a dashboard on its own changes nothing: knowing you are not cited does not tell you what to fix to become so. At Digitalyser.io, citation by assistants is one of the six scored modules of the diagnosis, read alongside content, reviews, local and technical SEO — and followed by the corrections.

What the measurement covers

Digitalyser.io

Engines tracked
±3 engines — GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6 — with per-engine probes, competing entities cited, and recommendationsSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Volume of queries tracked
±query set defined with you during the diagnosis, no public capSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Tracking frequency
±at each auditSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Competitors cited instead of you in the answers
✓competing entities cited, surfaced with the per-engine probesSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Connection to your own AI tools
✓the assistant does more than read: it runs an audit, creates content, asks for a revision — every action confirmed before it is appliedSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026

Peec AI

Engines tracked
✓« Choose 3 models » on the Starter, Pro and Advanced plansSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Volume of queries tracked
✓50 prompts (Starter), 150 (Pro), 350 (Advanced)Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Tracking frequency
✓« Daily tracking frequency » on every listed planSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Competitors cited instead of you in the answers
±competitive comparison announced, without public detail on the metricsSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Connection to your own AI tools
—Not publicly documented as of 31 Aug 2026Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026

Otterly.ai

Engines tracked
✓4 included — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, MS Copilot; Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini as paid add-onsSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Volume of queries tracked
✓15 prompts (Lite), 100 (Standard), 400 (Premium); +100 for $99Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Tracking frequency
✓« Daily tracking frequency » on every listed planSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Competitors cited instead of you in the answers
✓explicit tracking — « Me + Top 5 competitors », compared mentions and average position per brandSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Connection to your own AI tools
✓« MCP access » and « API access » from the Standard plan — the data arrives in your assistantSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026

What actually earns a citation

Digitalyser.io

AI citation connected to your other visibility signals
✓6 scored modules — local, reputation, presence, content, analytics, AI discoverability — plus technical SEO and competitor tracking, read togetherSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Priorities ranked by impact rather than a dashboard
✓Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Producing the content that makes you citable
✓content produced as part of the engagement — quotations, figures, sourcesSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Fixing the non-content signals — reviews, local listing, technical
✓Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Before/after measurement tying each action to its effect
✓Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026

Peec AI

AI citation connected to your other visibility signals
✕scope dedicated to tracking visibility inside AI enginesSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Priorities ranked by impact rather than a dashboard
±reports and analyses; the arbitration stays with your teamSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Producing the content that makes you citable
✕Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Fixing the non-content signals — reviews, local listing, technical
✕Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Before/after measurement tying each action to its effect
±share-of-voice evolution; the link to your actions is still to be establishedSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026

Otterly.ai

AI citation connected to your other visibility signals
✕scope dedicated to tracking visibility inside AI enginesSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Priorities ranked by impact rather than a dashboard
±same limitSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Producing the content that makes you citable
✕Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Fixing the non-content signals — reviews, local listing, technical
✕Source — checked on 31 Aug 2026
Before/after measurement tying each action to its effect
±same limitSource — checked on 31 Aug 2026

What it commits you to

Choose Otterly.ai if…

  • ✓You want to measure, and already have the team that will act on the results
  • ✓Tracking four engines for $29 a month answers your need
  • ✓You want to pipe the data into your own tools through API or MCP

Choose Peec AI if…

  • ✓Daily tracking of several hundred queries is your main criterion
  • ✓You manage several brands and want deeper reporting, up to Looker Studio
  • ✓You want the most established measurement tool in the category

Choose Digitalyser.io if…

  • ✓You already know you are not cited, and want to know what to change
  • ✓You want AI citation read alongside your reviews, your local listing and your content
  • ✓You want the content that makes you citable to be produced, not merely recommended
  • ✓You need to prove the corrections had an effect

15 min

for a full audit, no credit card

8

dimensions audited, read together

3

AI engines queried about your brand

€0

to start, with no commitment

Know why AI does not cite you, not merely that it doesn’t

The free audit queries three assistants about your brand, then connects the result to the rest of your visibility: content, reviews, local listing, technical. You leave with your priorities ranked.

Run my free audit

How we work

Methodology

Data collected on 31 Aug 2026 — This comparison is built from each vendor's public pages, without opening an account — the regime chosen to satisfy the verifiability requirement of article L122-1 of the French Consumer Code. Every value links to the page that supports it, with its survey date; all were surveyed on 31 August 2026 and every quotation was checked to be literally present on the page. Four reading notes. The offers are not of the same nature: two specialised measurement subscriptions against an accompanied diagnosis — stated in the verdict, and a reader looking for a measurement tool is explicitly pointed to them. The currencies differ — Otterly.ai lists in dollars, our prices are in euros; no amount has been converted. Peec AI's amounts are loaded by the browser and could not be captured from the public page: they are therefore absent from the table rather than assumed. Finally, « not publicly documented » means the capability is absent from the pages consulted on that date, never that the product lacks it. Stated limit: this comparison describes what vendors publicly announce, not what they deliver.

Frequently asked questions

See where you stand

A free visibility audit, in 15 minutes.