6/10
correct AI queries (vs 1/10)
90%
key schema.org coverage
23
entity facts fixed
Use case
A growing share of prospects no longer go through Google: they ask an AI agent, which only returns the brands it can identify as entities. Many businesses discover they are simply absent from those answers — or described incorrectly — while a competitor that got its entity signals right captures the channel. Monitoring tools hand over an "AI score" without saying why it is low or what to fix.
Digitalyser assesses how AI agents perceive and represent the brand, then ties that finding to concrete fixes: schema.org completeness (Organization, SameAs, FAQPage), entity status (Knowledge Graph, Wikidata), consistency of founding facts across platforms, and brand SERP quality. We frame the AI score as a trend with confidence bands — not a guaranteed position — and track how it moves after fixes.
6/10
correct AI queries (vs 1/10)
90%
key schema.org coverage
23
entity facts fixed
AI discoverability assessment and a remediation roadmap.
1 / 10 → 6 / 10
AI queries where the brand is cited correctly
40% → 90%
Schema.org coverage of key types
23
Entity-fact inconsistencies fixed
2 → 7 results
Brand SERP quality (controlled entities)
2025-2026 sector benchmarks (Ahrefs, BrightLocal, PowerReviews, G2) · digitalyser.io target outcomes
Start with the free audit to isolate the blocking signal and map the next highest-leverage actions.